| What detection/interface do you recommend | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
ferrari
Number of posts : 78 Localisation : Sydney Australia Registration date : 2006-01-25
| Subject: What detection/interface do you recommend 16/11/2007, 01:06 | |
| Hello Guy,
With many choices of detection available, what would be your first choice for PCL, for optimum reliability and any future updates you may have in mind.
I ask this for analogue racing.
Pino | |
|
| |
guy
Number of posts : 2297 Localisation : Belgique Registration date : 2006-01-25
| Subject: Re: What detection/interface do you recommend 16/11/2007, 02:10 | |
| | |
|
| |
ferrari
Number of posts : 78 Localisation : Sydney Australia Registration date : 2006-01-25
| Subject: Re: What detection/interface do you recommend 18/11/2007, 13:10 | |
| My apologies for the late reply. Many new changes which are terrific to see I also noticed you have recently upgraded your parallel port detection software, which I will give a go, but I have more faith with the phidgets option because you suggested it, and also because I feel that others have had more sucess with them here on your forum (having less or no missed laps) ...I just could not get the parallel port detection working reliably for me - Quote :
- Happy you back in the forum
Happy to experience your great service again Pino | |
|
| |
guy
Number of posts : 2297 Localisation : Belgique Registration date : 2006-01-25
| Subject: Re: What detection/interface do you recommend 18/11/2007, 16:22 | |
| | |
|
| |
lars_jacobsen
Number of posts : 92 Registration date : 2006-10-02
| Subject: Re: What detection/interface do you recommend 19/11/2007, 00:42 | |
| Hi Ferrari
I have not yet have the time to test the new and improved parrallel interface, but if this works as planned I would certainly recommend this over phidget - simply because phidget is to slow when counting the laps (0,008 sek)
I hope to have tested the new parrallel solution by next week and will give you our results, but anyway, we use phidget right now, and it counts every lap, only problem is the above mentioned refresh rate
But for the future development that Guy is considering Phidget will open up for a lot of great features
:-) | |
|
| |
ferrari
Number of posts : 78 Localisation : Sydney Australia Registration date : 2006-01-25
| Subject: Re: What detection/interface do you recommend 19/11/2007, 03:39 | |
| Thanks for the insight lars, I think reliable lap detection should be finally put to rest with a definite ‘bullet proof’ solution. PCL is very rich in features and flexibility and such a shame that I can’t get it to work without timing flaws. Interesting that Guy has asked for our PC specifications in another thread, because I have always wondered if that may be the cause of my missed laps (my computer is underpowered for today’s minimum specs) however I don’t have a problem with other software using an interface for lap timing…I’m just thinking out loud. Maybe this new parallel port improvement will be the solution. But for some reason (sorry I cannot back this statement up in technical terms) I believe that a dedicated interface card that actually does the timing, and then sends this information to the computer might be a more reliable method…some sort of buffer?? ...what are your thoughts? I have just recently moved home, the whole track was moved in one piece, now I’m left with the task of connecting the timing arrangement…interesting to see how you get on with new parallel port version of PCL, as I am looking for new direction and want to make PCL my system of choice. | |
|
| |
ferrari
Number of posts : 78 Localisation : Sydney Australia Registration date : 2006-01-25
| Subject: Re: What detection/interface do you recommend 30/11/2007, 02:07 | |
| I have Just noticed this: http://users.skynet.be/bk274532/trackmate.html We were speaking about this last night as a good idea with our club organiser...you must have heard us Brilliant! As this interface has proven to be bullet proof with 4 club tracks! Where is the 4.46 download button hiding | |
|
| |
guy
Number of posts : 2297 Localisation : Belgique Registration date : 2006-01-25
| Subject: Re: What detection/interface do you recommend 30/11/2007, 15:14 | |
| Thanks to Bjarne (a menber of this forum) who give me the necessary information to make the trackmate interface To download beta of version 4.46 just go to my website section news...you will find the link to beta.
Last edited by on 30/11/2007, 20:36; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
guy
Number of posts : 2297 Localisation : Belgique Registration date : 2006-01-25
| Subject: Re: What detection/interface do you recommend 30/11/2007, 20:31 | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: What detection/interface do you recommend | |
| |
|
| |
| What detection/interface do you recommend | |
|